← Manj ChennaEssays

The expertise layer · Plain language

A portal for human judgement

If an AI agent needs a person's judgment, where does it go to get it? Most systems have no answer, just an informal favor from whoever happens to be around. Naming the destination, a portal for human judgment, is what makes it something you can rely on.

Manj Chenna · Founder, Sanctity · Building human judgment infrastructure · Amsterdam

A portal for human judgment is the plain-language idea of a defined place an AI agent can go to reach an accountable person for a decision. The word portal is doing deliberate work: it turns human judgment from an ad hoc arrangement into a reliable, reachable part of the system. Without it, "a human can step in" is a hope. With it, reaching the right person for a hard decision is a designed capability, which is what human judgment infrastructure has to provide.

The idea
A portal for human judgement

A defined place where an AI agent can reach an accountable human for a decision, making human judgment a dependable part of the system rather than a favor.

Why a portal, not a person you happen to know

Because informal access does not scale and does not hold. If the only way an agent reaches a human is by knowing who to bother, then oversight depends on luck and goodwill, and fails quietly the moment either runs out. A portal makes the path explicit, so the question "can a person step in here" has a yes you can point to.

What it changes

It makes human judgment a property of the system instead of an exception to it. You can build on a portal: measure how long it takes to get a person, who answered, whether the answer held. You cannot build on a favor. Naming the destination is the first step to making the oversight real.

Read on

See how an AI agent asks a human and the accountable human.