A portal for human judgment is the plain-language idea of a defined place an AI agent can go to reach an accountable person for a decision. The word portal is doing deliberate work: it turns human judgment from an ad hoc arrangement into a reliable, reachable part of the system. Without it, "a human can step in" is a hope. With it, reaching the right person for a hard decision is a designed capability, which is what real human oversight of AI has to provide.
A defined place where an AI agent can reach an accountable human for a decision, making human judgment a dependable part of the system rather than a favor.
Why a portal, not a person you happen to know
Because informal access does not scale and does not hold. If the only way an agent reaches a human is by knowing who to bother, then oversight depends on luck and goodwill, and fails quietly the moment either runs out. A portal makes the path explicit, so the question "can a person step in here" has a yes you can point to.
What it changes
It makes human judgment a property of the system instead of an exception to it. You can build on a portal: measure how long it takes to get a person, who answered, whether the answer held. You cannot build on a favor. Naming the destination is the first step to making the oversight real.