The vision · Place

Building AI oversight in Amsterdam

It can look like a handicap to build under the strictest AI law in the world. I think it is the opposite. The hardest environment to satisfy is the best place to learn what real oversight requires, and to build it before everyone else has to.

I build human oversight of AI in Amsterdam, under the EU AI Act, on purpose. As the Act comes into force, meaningful human oversight of high-risk AI moves from optional to required, and the EU AI Act human oversight provisions become the floor a serious system has to clear. Building where that floor is highest is not a constraint on the work, it is a head start on it. Human oversight Amsterdam is a positioning I would choose again.

Why the law is a moat, not a burden

Because everyone selling into Europe will eventually have to meet it, and the people who learned to build for it early will be ahead of those who treated it as a late-stage compliance scramble. Hard requirements are a forcing function. They make you build the real thing instead of the demo, and the real thing is what holds when the rules everywhere catch up.

Building above the floor

The law sets the minimum; the work is to build above it. Amsterdam gives me a demanding baseline and a front-row view of how meaningful human oversight gets defined in practice. I would rather build human judgment infrastructure where the standard is high and watch the rest of the world move toward it than build where there is no standard and hope.